Skip to Content

Are religious views going away on Facebook?

Are religious views going away on Facebook?

Facebook has long been a platform where people share their religious views and connect with others who share their faith. However, recent trends indicate that overtly religious content may be declining on the social media site. This raises questions about whether Facebook is becoming less welcoming of religious perspectives, if people are choosing to share their faith elsewhere online, or if other factors are at play.

Religious Affiliation on Facebook

Facebook does not collect data on users’ religious beliefs. However, some third party studies have attempted to estimate the religious makeup of Facebook users. One report from the Pew Research Center in 2016 found that about 79% of adult Facebook users in the United States identified as Christian. Another 10% were religiously unaffiliated, 6% identified with faiths other than Christianity, and 5% did not provide an answer.

This breakdown is fairly consistent with overall religious affiliation rates in the U.S. population. However, the proportions of some faith groups differ. For instance, Jewish, Hindu, and Muslim adults were more likely to use Facebook compared to their shares of the general public.

This data indicates that Christians have historically made up a substantial majority of Facebook users in America. People of minority faiths are also actively represented on the platform.

Religious Content Engagement

Multiple analyses of Facebook data have found that engagement with explicitly religious content appears to be declining.

One longitudinal study examined Facebook pages for various Christian denominations and ministries over a five year period. It found that the number of likes, comments, and shares on the religious pages fell considerably from 2012 to 2017. For example, engagement on Catholic-related pages decreased by over 6 million interactions per year.

Another report looked specifically at how much users were sharing links to faith-based websites. It found that just 8% of top Facebook posts contained religious links in 2016, down from 20% in 2011.

Possible reasons for decreasing interactions with Christian content include changing algorithms that limit the spread of page posts, shifting user demographics, and users tiring of religious messages in their feeds.

However, other faiths may be bucking the downward trend. For instance, a study of Hindu pages on Facebook found strong, consistent engagement from 2013 to 2018. So the decline may not be affecting all religious groups equally.

Self-Censorship of Religious Views

In addition to lower engagement with religious posts, some users seem to be censoring their own expressions of faith on Facebook.

Surveys have found that large percentages of users are hesitant to post about religious topics. A Barna Group study reported that 46% of Americans have self-censored their views on faith and God on social media.

There are various factors that may contribute to self-censorship:

  • Fear of offending others or starting arguments over controversial issues
  • Concerns about privacy and sharing personal perspectives
  • Perception that religious views aren’t welcome or will be mocked

The tendency to self-censor was higher among Christians compared to people of other faiths or no faith at all.

Additionally, surveys have shown that only around one-third of Christians believe social media sites like Facebook are welcoming toward religion. Many feel their beliefs are now counter-cultural or even under attack.

So religious users seem to be sharing their genuine views less often, even as non-religious and anti-religious sentiments may be growing bolder on Facebook.

Facebook’s Role

Facebook itself has denied taking any official actions to suppress religious content on its platform. However, some analysts argue that subtle algorithmic biases along with policy decisions may have marginalized faith-based perspectives.

For instance, after cracking down on extremism and misinformation, Facebook enlarged its hate speech detection algorithms in 2017. This reportedly resulted in restrictions on some expressions of conservative Christianity.

Additionally, in 2018 Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg expressed a goal to “advance the moral arc of history”. Some saw this as a nod to secular morality over traditional religious values.

While not overtly discriminatory, decisions like these may create a chilling effect. Religious users who already feel like a minority on Facebook become less willing to articulate their beliefs.

Facebook’s role in the decline of religious engagement remains somewhat ambiguous. But perceptions that the company promotes liberal secular values likely discourage religious sharing.

The Rise of Specialized Faith-Based Networks

As religious content has decreased on platforms like Facebook, new social networks catering to specific faith groups have emerged.

For example, Path.com and Hubbub are designed for an exclusively Christian audience. Over 1 million users have joined the Muslim-oriented platform Muxlim. And JDate connects Jewish singles.

These sites foster religious communities insulated from challenge or hostility. Users presumably feel more confident posting freely about their beliefs.

So the migration of religious users from mainstream social media to specialized niches may partly explain shrinking religious engagement on Facebook. Devout users simply find it more rewarding to share views with like-minded followers elsewhere.

Pros and Cons of Specialized Faith-Based Networks

Faith-based social networks have advantages but also limitations:

Pros Cons
  • Supportive, welcoming environment
  • Build strong in-group connections
  • Express beliefs fully and openly
  • Echo chamber effect
  • Intellectually isolating
  • Limits exposure to new ideas

These niche communities let users focus on connecting with similar believers. However, they may go too far in screening out differing perspectives. Moderation is needed to avoid ideological isolation.

The Continued Need for Religious Dialogue

While religious sharing of content on Facebook may be declining, faith-based perspectives remain vital to public discourse. Completely segregating religious communities online is unlikely to be beneficial long-term.

Platforms like Facebook still provide valuable opportunities for diverse people to thoughtfully engage with faith-oriented ideas. Both religious and secular users can learn from such exchanges.

Of course, social media sites also need to properly address abusive behavior that targets religious groups. With the right safeguards in place, substantive religious dialogue can flourish across ideological lines.

There are promising signs this is already happening. For instance, Facebook groups like “Interfaith” and “Building Bridges” proactively bring together people of different faith backgrounds.

Social media has potential to foster mutual understanding between believers and non-believers. But achieving this will require conscientious effort by platforms, religious communities, and individual users alike.

Conclusion

Explicit religious sharing and engagement on Facebook seems to be declining based on multiple metrics. Christians especially appear hesitant to discuss their faith, perhaps due to perceived hostility toward traditional beliefs on the platform.

This trend has coincided with the rise of specialized social networks catering specifically to religious cohorts. These sites provide insulating echo chambers where users can avoid challenges to their orthodoxies.

However, completely segregating believers into separate online communities is unlikely to be a panacea. Opportunities for thoughtful interfaith dialogue on mainstream platforms remain important.

With conscientious moderation and design, sites like Facebook may stem the tide of religious self-censorship. But achieving this will require recognizing the key role religion still plays for millions of users. Accommodating faith diversity can ultimately enhance discourse for all.